Working with learners in the digital age – workshop
Teacher Educators working with diverse groups of learners in the digital age
Date: 17 October 2011
Venue: University of Wolverhampton
Fee: Free to attend (but spaces are limited).
This event will draw upon cross phase examples (Primary, Secondary and Post Compulsory ITE). Practitioners and researchers from the field will offer thought provoking contexts for the workshop which is intended to be an opportunity for networking and discussion.
Confirmed speakers so far:
Moira Savage, Senior Lecturer in Primary Initial Teacher Training at University of Worcester, Institute of Education e-learning Co-ordinator
Kathy Wright, Discipline Lead for Education at the Higher Education Academy
Graham Lowe, Senior Lecturer in Primary Science Education, Birmingham City University
Julie Hughes, Head of Department and the PCE Partnership at the University of Wolverhampton, HEA National Teaching Fellow
Allen Crawford-Thomas eLearning Advisor, West Midlands Regional Support Centre JISC
This event is for both the novice as well as the more experienced practitioner.
Registration is now open and spaces are limited. To register for free please visit http://escalate.ac.uk/8420
BSA Education Stream – Call for Papers – Annual Conference 2012
CALL FOR PAPERS – EDUCATION STREAM – BSA ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2012
** DEADLINE FOR ABSTRACTS 7TH OCTOBER **
The Education stream has recently been one of, if not the, largest at conference in terms of the numbers of abstracts submitted and sessions running. In 2011 we accepted enough abstracts for a stream event in every session of conference, and had parallel streams on two of the three days. Both delegate attendance and quality of the sessions were impressively high throughout.
We anticipate the sociology of education having a very high profile again next year; our stream plenary will be on Education and Social Mobility in an Age of Austerity and we are planning to have a social event sponsored by the British Journal of Sociology of Education.
Education Study Group co-convenors David Mellor and Richard Waller would like you to participate next year and encourage you to submit abstracts for the 2012 conference on any phase or aspect of Education that you might currently be working on.
Offers of individual papers and workshops are welcome, whether in the traditional format or something more ‘experimental’. Symposia around particular themes or specific projects would be very welcome too. Please contact the stream convenors if you would like to discuss any ideas.
For details on how to submit your abstract, see:
http://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/conference/abs.htm.
The deadline for submission of abstracts is 7th October 2011.
For further information:
Dr Richard Waller, UWE Bristol [richard.waller@uwe.ac.uk], or
Dr David Mellor, University of Bristol [david.mellor@bristol.ac.uk]
Alternatively, visit the conference website: www.britsoc.co.uk/events/conference.html
International Sociology of Education Conference
INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION CONFERENCE
4th to 6th November 2011, London
SPEAKERS INCLUDE:
Dr Azreem Badroodien (South Africa)
Dr John Beck (UK)
Professor Xavier Bonal (Spain)
Dr. Naomi Hodgson (UK)
Dr. Kate Hoskins (UK)
Professor Jack Keating (Australia)
Dr. Terri Kim (UK)
Dr. Antonia Kupfer (USA)
Dr. Elizabeth Rata (New Zealand)
Dr. Julia Resnik (Israel)
Dr. Philippe Vitale (France)
Professor Michael Young (UK)
Conference venue: The Royal Foundation of St Katharine, 2 Butcher Row, London, E14 8DS.
For further information contact Professor Suzy Harris, s.harris@roehampton.ac.uk
Conference booking details can be obtained from Mrs Helen Oliver, School of Education, University of Sheffield 388 Glossop Road, SHEFFIELD S10 2JA, UK [h.j.oliver@sheffield.ac.uk]
Early booking is essential if you wish to attend the conference
Higher Education in the Liquid Modern Era: Swirling Down the Drain?
BSA Regional Postgraduate Day School Event 2011
Higher Education in the Liquid Modern Era: Swirling Down the Drain?
The Bauman Institute, University of Leeds Friday 9 September, 2011
Book now: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/events/postgrad.htm
The metaphor of liquidity is used in Zygmunt Bauman’s work to represent the loss of security felt as more the ‘solid’ institutions and ‘traditional’ patterns of social relations of modernity break down/dissolve in the contemporary world. A striking example of this can be found to exist in the situation facing contemporary participants – students, teachers and researchers – in higher education (HE), especially those working in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. The ‘traditional’ pursuits of academia are being increasingly undermined by changes which are aimed at subordinating free enquiry to the shifting demands of the marketplace. The proposed changes to HE funding outlined by the current UK coalition government seem likely to further exacerbate the tendency towards instrumentalism in HE, while simultaneously destabilizing employment in both the knowledge and the culture industries in the UK for many years to come. In light of these recent proposals, and the likely assault on non-STEM subjects that will ensue, we feel that it would be productive to consider as postgraduate students the likely landscape which we are about to enter. We aim to do this by drawing on Bauman, who has written and recently lectured on the role of sociologists and higher education in contemporary society (‘Education in Liquid Modernity’, 2005; Sociology – Whence and Whither?: Speech from the Bauman Institute Launch Conference, 2010), as well as others, in order to produce a written statement in defence of social science. Whilst this will be a collaborative effort, with input predominantly from sociology postgraduates, we envisage inviting a small number of postgraduates and academics from other disciplines to contribute their ideas and efforts. Through this, we suggest that a more comprehensive understanding of the common problems facing those across the social sciences, at different stages in their academic lives, can help us to produce a justification of sociology’s continuing value and importance beyond narrow, mechanistic definitions of ‘impact’. The aim of the event is to provide a space for postgraduate social scientists to engage in critical reflection on the proposed changes to higher education funding in the UK and their implications for our so-called ‘knowledge’ society, particularly through drawing on the insights provided in the work of Zygmunt Bauman on the insecurities and uncertainties of life in liquid modern times. The event will consist of a mix of papers from postgraduate students, three keynote speakers, panel discussion, and collaborative workshop sessions. Postgraduate students will receive first preference for places.
Registration fees: BSA Members: Free Non-members: £25
Welcoming the new academic year…
Hello to everyone,
As we say goodbye to the summer and welcome the arrival of a new academic year, regular socofed posts will be with you once again. Please get in touch with us if you have any events, news or publications that you’d like to share, or if you have an article that you’d like us to post here.
Kind regards
David and Richard
The one-dimensional university – new online article available
Filip Vostal, Lorenzo Silvaggi and Rosa Vasilaki (University of Bristol) have published an article titled One-dimensional university realised: Capitalist ethos and ideological shifts in Higher Education, which engages with the transformations currently taking place within the university. They argue that significant and fundamental changes to ‘academic freedom, curiosity-driven scholarship, research and pedagogy’ have been shaped by a capitalist logic that has redefined the ethos of higher education, while exploring debates among academic and educational leaders.
They conclude:
The trends described throughout this paper, i.e. the transformation of the university in line with the imperatives of the capitalist ethos, the increasing prominence of an exclusionary and instrumental conceptualisation of knowledge and the conditioning of subjectivity according to the discipline of the market, favour the emergence of a generalised condition of instrumentalization not only of HE but of intellectual life itself. In other words, they create the conditions of rise of a ‘pattern of one-dimensional thought and behaviour in which ideas, aspirations, and objectives that, by their content, transcend the established universe of discourse and action are either repelled or reduced to terms of this universe. They are redefined by the rationality of the given system and of its quantitative extension’ as Marcuse explains in his seminal One-Dimensional Man (1964). The neo-liberal blackmail of ‘elite’ education of ‘ivory towers’ versus the ‘pragmatic’ education of ‘real problems’ to which there is only one choice and one alternative – that of disciplining knowledge, politics and society to the logic of the market – needs to be superseded in order to imagine the university beyond the elitism of the past and the presentist discourse of market capitalism. Dissecting the dominant neoliberal ideology requires the intrinsic critical power of arts, humanities and interpretive social sciences more than ever.
The full paper can be accessed here.
Sociology and me: the battle with the little red pill
In the following essay, Mike Ward offers a very personal reflection on his early career as a sociologist. This autobiographical piece offers many thinking points for sociologists of education.
Sociology and me: the battle with the little red pill
By Mike Ward, Cardiff University
At the end of the 1990s the science fiction film The Matrix was released. The film is set in a post-modern global city situated in a simulated world called the Matrix, which was created by computers and machines. In the Matrix, humans are controlled and live in an illusionary dream, unaware of the true oppressive reality of their lives. In the back of a dark taxicab, the lead character Neo is offered a choice that will change his understanding of the world around him. He is given a simple decision to make, to take a red pill and see the world in a different light and how it really exists, or to take a blue pill and to wake up the next morning none the wiser in the world as he had always known it. He chose the red pill.
After the BSA 60 annual conference at the LSE, I must confess I was feeling rather disillusioned with my own academic subject, sociology, and its future. I began to reflect on what the point of sociology was in the face of so many changes. I wondered why I was persevering with the discipline and an academic career. How can we as social scientists pursue others that the sociological imagination is valid and worth possessing? I thought of the red pill Neo had taken in The Matrix and which had awoken him from his illusionary existence; I wondered maybe it would have been better if I had taken the blue pill instead?
My own sociological journey began almost by accident, very much like David Mellor’s (who wrote about his own journey in a recent BSA blog). It was the autumn of 1999 and I was in my final year of my A levels in a comprehensive school in the South Wales valleys. I was searching for an interesting course to put onto my UCAS form as I knew I didn’t want to study something for another three years that I was doing at the time (English Literature, History and Geography). Neither of my parents or my stepparents had been to university, so they suggested above all else that I did something I would find interesting. So following their advice: I started to look for something else. I wasn’t doing particularly well in my subjects and I realised I was never going to get into Oxbridge or a ‘proper’ university, but knew I wanted to go and to do something which was to do with people.
I literally stumped onto the subject one day in the tiny sixth form library (a single filing cabinet!) while flicking through the prospectus for the University of the West of England (UWE) in Bristol. It seemed perfect. There was a course called sociology which appeared to be about how and why people behaved in certain ways and how they were shaped by the time and place they lived in. Autobiographically it seemed the right fit. Both my Grandfathers had been coal miners and active trade unionists. Politics and current events were always talked about around the dinner table with my mother. Sociology seemed very much about the underdog and looked like it fitted in with many of the conversations I’d been brought up with. The university was also away from South Wales which was one of my main requirements, but not too far if things got lonely. Contact time was low (eight hours a week), entry requirements were moderate (one C and two D’s) and if I deferred a year (as I planned to do some volunteering in a children’s home in America) the grades would be lowered to three D’s. The modules on offer also seemed interesting with courses ranging from the ‘Individual and Society’ to the more exotic ‘Anthropology, Magic and Wicca’. When my results came through that August and I received three D grades I checked to see if UWE would still have me the following year, I was told that they would and looking back now, paid it little further attention.
After a disastrous time in America and nine months woefully dealing with PAYE tax for the Inland Revenue, I arrived at the University of the West of England Frenchay campus in September 2001. I was unaware of it at the time, but it was here that I took my red pill and my outlook on the world began to change. I owe a debt of gratitude to the likes of Bill Hill, Maeve Landman, Arthur Baxter, Steve Garner and Dave Green who were all at UWE at the time, for helping me through those early years. I failed my first ever essay on Marx and Weber, receiving a miserable 34%. In part I’m sure was due to me spelling Weber with two B’s throughout the essay. I was no over-night sociologist, but I kept at it, kept reading and writing, and after three years I received a 2.1 at the end of it.
After my degree, sociology slipped under the radar for a year or two and I worked for a while as a produce manager for a supermarket saving to travel and then backpacking around Asia, Australia and New Zealand. After I returned to the UK I realised I could not commit the rest of my life to the retail industry and returned to study; this time at Cardiff University, for a PGCE in further education specialising in sociology. At first I found it a struggle to get back into reading and writing again but over the first few months got back into the swing of things and developed confidence in my teaching skills before going out to my college placement to teach sociology AS, A2 and Access courses. Although it was extremely tiring planning and delivering lessons from scratch, I found it much more rewarding than managing a department in a supermarket. However, I still had some doubts about just spending my time teaching other sociologists theory, ideas and research. I wanted to do my own studies.
While applying for full time teaching posts in F.E. colleges across the country, I also had one eye on a +3 PhD studentship in Cardiff. Unfortunately I didn’t receive funding. In August of 2007 I had a choice to make. I was offered full time teaching position and a surprisingly high salary for a first post to teach sociology at an F.E. college in Cornwall. I pondered over the decision for a few days. I still wanted to do the PhD at Cardiff, but realised if I went to Cornwall this would realistically be the end of my research dream. I wanted to teach but I also wanted to make my own impact on the subject; finally, I decided to opt for a research methods course (which I self funded from money I’d saved from the bursary I’d received from the Welsh Assembly Government to do the PGCE) and hoped I would be awarded funding for the PhD the following year. My father in particular couldn’t quite believe I’d turned down a well paid job for yet more study. He’d left school at 16 and worked for the same company for 40 years, so it just didn’t make sense to him.
For the next year while studying full time for an MSc in research methods, I continued to teach sociology (and, bizarrely, home economics!) part-time at an F.E. college. Working closely with my supervisors at Cardiff, I submitted a PhD proposal in the spring, which sought to look at the lives of young men and their educational choices post-16 through carrying out an ethnographic study in a deprived community in South Wales. In the spring of 2008 while taking a home economics cookery lesson (possibly one of my greatest achievements in teaching to date!) I received a phone call offering me a +3 PhD studentship at Cardiff. Barely holding it together I excused myself from the classroom to listen to the rest of what I was being told and, holding back the tears, gratefully accepted the offer. Over the last two and a half years my PhD has been a roller coaster ride, from moments of great highs such as presenting my work at a conference in Sweden or taking one of the worlds greatest masculinity scholars, Raewyn Connell, for lunch and sightseeing around Cardiff; to lows that I never thought would happen when one of the young men from my study tragically died in a horrible car accident just weeks after his nineteenth birthday.
So has the red pill been worth taking? Of course it’s helped me look at the world in a different way and to challenge taken for granted assumptions. In my particular field of sociology, the sociology of education, I have seen through my empirical work how educational choices, achievement, opportunities and future life chances are directly linked to issues of social class, gender and ethnicity. Nonetheless, because of these insights I find myself angry a lot of the time. I find it hard to watch or listen to the news on the TV or radio or read a magazine without analysing it as I go through it. I shout comments at the TV whenever I hear a politician speak, and mutter to myself in the cinema at ridiculous plotlines and blatant product placement. I’ve watched The Wire and cried with utter frustration at the end of every series and found a new love for Bruce Springsteen and his song lyrics. I am also dearly thankful that I was at the Gender and Education conference during the royal wedding so I could avoid it all. My friends and family outside academia (there is another world out there!) call me cynical and tell me I think about things too much: that, I am sure, is certainly the case. But I have noticed that they do discuss the news and what’s going on in the world and the communities they live in. After all, people aren’t passive dupes. Even in The Matrix Neo did find his own way to that red pill.
After the hectic few days at the LSE I spent the weekend with friends I’d met while travelling and who now live in North London. It was nice to get away from sociologists for a while at least! However, as always I couldn’t quite switch off. Along with my two friends – one who works in I.T. for the Bank of England and the other as a town planner for Camden council – we talked about all manner of things. These included the Olympics, how expensive London seemed to be, and how they hated the Barclay cycle hire bikes (Boris bikes) currently creeping across the capital. As they saw it, instead of these bikes making the London transport system more effective, they were just a sticking plaster on the solution to the transport problems and a way to keep people living in the city thinking that innovated solutions were being thought out. Of course this is also one innovative solution which is sponsored by a national bank! They both told me how they’d got so fed up of living in London that they had applied for visas to work in Canada. It occurred to me later after we’d parted and I had returned from London and the post conference world that my two friends also have a sociological imagination, of sorts. They might not ‘officially’ have taken the red pill, but they do not passively accept the world as it is either.
As sociologists, we see the world in a particular way, which not all of us may agree on and which is often depressing, but highly exciting and illuminating. We should still be grateful that we embarked on this journey despite the odds stacked against us. Maybe our role as sociologists and educators, then, is not just to teach people about ways of thinking and theorising the world around us in academic environments, but also to be able to provide a platform that will enable the thinking to occur in the first place? Perhaps it’s time then for us all to pass those red pills around?